"Forget it, Jay. It's Chinatown."
I read 10 first pages of the script, knew the synopsis, the ending, major plot points but it just proves that you never know how a film can turn out.
Because this one is beautiful and totally unexpected in a lot of ways.
The main hero is not a typical hero but I think I should attribute it to Jack Nicholson's talent: he makes awful crude jokes, he's absolutely insolent but he's also endearing and you just root for him.
The thought that kept running through my head was He's been had! again and again. And when Evelyn tells him the truth he looks dejected and heartbroken as if his whole world has just been destroyed.
And in a way, it has. For some reason I think it's not the first time a case goes awry like this because it's Chinatown. There's a reason he left the police force, and it's not a woman. He isn't that callous and hardhearted and he doesn't want to become that. He still believes in people, he's still a decent guy who won't take someone's last dime. He maintains this last bit of decency by leaving Chinatown and working for the police. Because this Escobar guy does not have it. I don't want to excuse him by saying that it's his job, I just don't like him.
This movie is the first time I realize that in those times, times of films that are considered classic, women were rarely characters who meant as much as men. One of the last shots of Chinatown is four men talking to each other - similar hats, suits, literally all shades of grey. And they are all characters that we've learnt something about. There is also Evelyn (and Katherine's) father and a bunch of other males. But on the female side we only have Evelyn and I guess Katherine (I don't think I'll even forget her screams in the end). Faye Dunaway is brilliant but it just doesn't seem enough.
Also, I'm not sure if it's racism or what (or they just didn't care about that in the 1970s) but calling it all Chinatown and making it the worst place in the city? The wild place of injustice and chaos?
It could have been the worst place in the city, I wasn't even born in that time, but to me (someone who spends too much time around persuasive pro-equality Internet people) it does seem kind of racist.
But! I liked the film. (I'm gonna keep stating it everywhere unless I wasn't clear).
Monday, July 22, 2013
Chinatown (1974)
Labels:
Chinatown,
crime,
detectives,
Faye Dunaway,
film 7,
injustice,
Jack Nicholson,
murder,
Roman Polanski
Sunday, July 21, 2013
Jurassic Park
Just the right amount of excitement and adrenaline (those dinosaurs were scary!), sort-of valuable observations and humour. I loved it.
I really want to know though: the dinosaurs on the island became extinct again, I hope? Or they didn't and that's why there are sequels?
I'm not sure about other parts of the franchise. For some reason I doubt they are as great as the first one. Well, whatever.
Conclusion: I learnt some stuff about dinosaurs and had a great time.
Now I'm actually in the middle of watching the next film (I forgot to write this thing yesterday) so I'm gonna get back to it. Hint: the next film is older and judging by the first 30 minutes it's also a-mazing.
Labels:
dinosaurs,
film 6,
Jurassic Park,
kids,
scary,
sexism,
Steven Spielberg,
theme parks
Saturday, July 20, 2013
The Lone Ranger
Visually, it's like The Pirates Of Caribbean once again. Gore Verbinski is lazy. And I so don't want to admit it but Johnny Depp has gotten lazy: similar parts, similar expressions, similar gestures, argh. And as I see box-office wise the combination of Helena Bonham Carter and Johnny doesn't work if it's not Tim Burton. (Although despite word of mouth people still go check it out, disbelieving that Depp can star in anything so awful).
40 minutes into the movie I glanced at my phone to check the time. That was the moment when I felt that it was time to end this shit. I should have walked out of the theatre but I don't do that. I clench my teeth, I stare at other people's faces trying to gauge their reactions, I check twitter and other social networks, I send angry text messages to a friend who recommended this movie (and feel satisfied when they text me back saying that they're really bored at the moment, too).
I spent the remaining 100 minutes trying to understand what makes this movie so terrible and dull. What I came up with is that the situation the main heroes constantly find themselves in doesn't change. The bad guys slips away, they don't get their revenge, they don't snatch the girl and her kid and they just keep coming up with new plans. It would make a great series, but a movie? Not so much.
He still doesn't get the girl in the end, by the way.
Shit luck.
Friday, July 19, 2013
The Bling Ring
Lately I've found out that I should always start with my opinion of the film because apparently my "analysis" has a tendency to be negative, whatever it means.
If I don't agree with the message of the film (or think that it doesn't have one), it doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it. Duh.
I liked this one. I like Sofia Coppola's work: it's stylish, very musical and well done. I like Kirsten Dunst (even though she appears here very briefly) and I like pretty clothes (there is plenty of that in the movie).
The film is short (which is terrific!), the plot moves fast and it's visually appealing (all those nice things, what, I'm a girl!).
Stealing things, entering without permission and just going too far is bad. We know it.
Materialism is innate to American culture (it really is, you can't deny it)
But there's probably a reason why Coppola decided to make this movie. It might seem that it doesn't have something profound to say but what if it does?
It's not as simple as a story of teenagers who have too much time on their hands. It seems like more of a satire of the Hollywood socialites whose lifestyle really inspires these teens because nothing else apparently does. They are difficult kids but their parents don't seem to care. Their parents aren't role models, they are either overbearing or almost invisible. These kids are lost in the big bad world and they are only able to follow the examples of Paris Hilton, Lindsey Lohan and the like.
It's not a new issue but we still haven't found the solution to this.
If I don't agree with the message of the film (or think that it doesn't have one), it doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it. Duh.
I liked this one. I like Sofia Coppola's work: it's stylish, very musical and well done. I like Kirsten Dunst (even though she appears here very briefly) and I like pretty clothes (there is plenty of that in the movie).
The film is short (which is terrific!), the plot moves fast and it's visually appealing (all those nice things, what, I'm a girl!).
Stealing things, entering without permission and just going too far is bad. We know it.
Materialism is innate to American culture (it really is, you can't deny it)
But there's probably a reason why Coppola decided to make this movie. It might seem that it doesn't have something profound to say but what if it does?
It's not as simple as a story of teenagers who have too much time on their hands. It seems like more of a satire of the Hollywood socialites whose lifestyle really inspires these teens because nothing else apparently does. They are difficult kids but their parents don't seem to care. Their parents aren't role models, they are either overbearing or almost invisible. These kids are lost in the big bad world and they are only able to follow the examples of Paris Hilton, Lindsey Lohan and the like.
It's not a new issue but we still haven't found the solution to this.
Labels:
alcohol,
drug use,
Emma Watson,
film 4,
film challenge,
materialism,
nice things,
parties,
socialites,
Sofia Coppola,
teenagers,
The Bling Ring
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Cat On A Hot Tin Roof
I like Tennessee Williams. Emotions, feelings, tears, frustration, love, hate - it's all jumbled together in one melting pot of a human being, and it always works.
I wonder how long it took him to create a character, because all his heroes and heroines are startlingly real. From the writing point of view, Cat On A Hot Tin Roof is a perfect example of how the dramatic conflict grows out of the characters and their differences.
The movie is true to the book: additional sequences to visualize the story, the change of the setting (no one goes to movies to see people sitting in one place all the time and talking, after all), everything pretty standard. The change of the setting is also a pretty brilliant idea since it dramatizes the conversation between Brick and Big Daddy.
They go from Brick and Maggie's room to the room downstairs to the parking lot and end up in the basement. I'm not sure but it can be an awesome director's decision: it's like they're getting rid of mendacity, layer by layer, going deeper and deeper and finally facing the truth. It creates the sense of irrational movement, of the two men trying to get out of the cage of lies.
Maggie The Cat simply tries to stay on a hot tin roof, and I feel that's why Brick, Big Daddy along with the writer respect her. She doesn't scheme, she doesn't plan, she glues her paws to the roof, no matter how uncomfortable and deadly it might be, and she holds on for dear life. Because that's who she is and it's why we love her.
Monday, July 8, 2013
Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters
It was a very (un)fortunate turn of events that I saw this movie. Seriously. My friend just got this fancy 3D TV set with glasses and all, and it was the only movie they had in 3D, and I just had to check it out. Yeah.
Lie be told, I've always wanted to see this film. I really like it when classic childhood stories are cinematically retold with abundance of blood and literal head-stomping. This is a dream come true, I'm telling ya.
It's all very action-movie like, appropriate "adventure" music, panning shots and things flying out of the TV. Typical plot, definite ending, very cool "tag" scene in the end, has a nice Hollywood touch, cliches, and I think (hope) Brothers Grimm have long ago stopped turning over in their graves; and people who first made up this story have stopped caring altogether even long before the rise of German Romanticism in early 19th century.
Spoilers or sort-of, duh:
1. The red-headed witch dies, and of course Jeremy Renner is still lonely, bad-ass and availably hot as hell.
2. There's even something like Shrek and Fiona story, and the troll resembles Harry Potter trolls TOO much.
3. Am I the only one or the way Hansel looks at Gretel really has sometimes an incestuous feel to it?
4. Only women can be witches --> witch-craft is bad --> women become super ugly when they practice this crazy magic stuff. But did you really have to make all witches cripples and invalids of different kinds? I get the logic, but it's not really fair: we aim at constructing an equal-for-all society and that's not really helpful.
5. Really fucking cruel.
6. Historically inaccurate.
Lie be told, I've always wanted to see this film. I really like it when classic childhood stories are cinematically retold with abundance of blood and literal head-stomping. This is a dream come true, I'm telling ya.
It's all very action-movie like, appropriate "adventure" music, panning shots and things flying out of the TV. Typical plot, definite ending, very cool "tag" scene in the end, has a nice Hollywood touch, cliches, and I think (hope) Brothers Grimm have long ago stopped turning over in their graves; and people who first made up this story have stopped caring altogether even long before the rise of German Romanticism in early 19th century.
Spoilers or sort-of, duh:
1. The red-headed witch dies, and of course Jeremy Renner is still lonely, bad-ass and availably hot as hell.
2. There's even something like Shrek and Fiona story, and the troll resembles Harry Potter trolls TOO much.
3. Am I the only one or the way Hansel looks at Gretel really has sometimes an incestuous feel to it?
4. Only women can be witches --> witch-craft is bad --> women become super ugly when they practice this crazy magic stuff. But did you really have to make all witches cripples and invalids of different kinds? I get the logic, but it's not really fair: we aim at constructing an equal-for-all society and that's not really helpful.
5. Really fucking cruel.
6. Historically inaccurate.
Labels:
3D,
action movie,
bloody,
film 2,
Hansel & Gretel,
Jeremy Renner,
magic,
pseudo-history,
witches
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Django Unchained
Yeah, I've got to admit that I am not yet done with the Oscars 2013.
I like this poster.
Here's a bullet point list:
I like this poster.
Here's a bullet point list:
- Django is a hero alright. He deserves to have a film named after him.
- blood-blood-blood-ketchup-ketchup-paint-blood
- soundtrack
- pre-Civil War times (I'm not great with the history of the U.S. though)
- DiCaprio's accent, and I just like how everyone says "bounty hunter" here. They make it sound so romantic.
But as usual I'm not quite sure what Tarantino wanted to say.
1) Injustice and racial prejudices suck, and those times were super cruel. One had to kill people to be free. If that's so, thanks for a visual representation then, just what I needed - an image of a man being torn to pieces by dogs.
2) It's the south, baby, and I like when men gallop on their horses into the sunset. I play one of those cowboy fellows because it's every boy's dream to be a cowboy.
3) Freedom to all! Unchain "niggers"!
4) Corruptness, cowardice, but now let's get to the killing. Money may rule the world, but having a loaded pistol strapped to your hip or reserved for special occasions in your sleeve is ten times better.
5) I just wanna make a movie.
But I guess you've got to have a special talent for stuffing a movie with so many possible interpretations.
Clap-clap-applause, Mr.Tarantino. Blood was gruesome, but overall it was a pleasure: fast paced, character development, stylish, totally worth spending 165 minutes of my time.
Labels:
american history,
bloody,
cowboys,
Django Unchained,
film 1,
film challenge,
history,
injustice,
Leonardo diCaprio,
money,
oscars 2013,
prejudice,
Quentin Tarantino,
summer challenge,
Tarantino
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)